A Comprehensive (and Completely Sincere) Response to Farrell’s Analysis of Elon Musk’s Gesture Controversy

Reply to Nicholas Farrell Of The Spectator

Ah, Farrell’s deep dive into the mechanics of hand-waving—a masterpiece of historical nitpicking masquerading as analysis. (Elon Musk’s ‘Nazi salute’ – an expert’s view). It’s the kind of work that makes you question the very nature of academic objectivity. Was the gesture Roman? Nazi? Farrell’s answer is simple: who cares about context when you can debate the precise angle of a billionaire’s elbow? Let’s break down this epic intellectual dodge with the reverence and seriousness it so clearly demands.

Farrell’s Historical Journey: Trivial Pursuit Edition

Farrell, like a man proudly solving a Rubik’s Cube during a house fire, focuses all his energy on the mechanics of Musk’s arm. Roman salute? Nazi salute? Or perhaps—plot twist—a Star Wars-style high-five? (It’s always nice to inject a little sci-fi to distract from fascist undertones.) Farrell concludes that Musk’s gesture doesn’t technically meet the standards for fascist iconography, but that’s like saying a poison-laced cupcake isn’t a health hazard because the frosting looks nice.

And let’s not overlook the joy of Farrell’s historical detours. He brings up the Bellamy salute—the wholesome American gesture from the Pledge of Allegiance that was ditched faster than a sinking ship when it started looking uncomfortably Third Reich-ish. “See?” Farrell seems to say, “Symbols evolve!” They sure do, Farrell, but not usually for the better when someone like Musk gets involved.

Musk’s Behavioural Greatest Hits: A Symphony of Provocations

Farrell treats Musk’s gesture as an isolated incident, which is almost adorable in its naivety. This isn’t Musk’s first foray into the polarising gesture game. Remember when he boosted antisemitic conspiracies like they were his new favourite cryptocurrency? Or the time he spoke at a rally for Germany’s far-right AfD party, casually suggesting they just “move on” from all that pesky historical guilt? Farrell apparently skipped those chapters of the Elon Musk saga—probably too busy fact-checking Roman statues for hand position accuracy.

And then there’s Musk’s favourite playground, X (formerly Twitter). Under his stewardship, it’s become a veritable hub for hate speech, conspiracy theories, and the sort of content that makes you wonder if the entire internet was a mistake. Banned accounts reinstated, algorithms boosting divisive content—it’s a buffet of chaos, with Musk as the gleeful chef.

The Power of Public Gestures: Context, Who Needs It?

Ah, the beauty of a public gesture. In the hands of someone like Musk, a simple wave transforms into a Rorschach test for fascism. Farrell dismisses it as overreaction—after all, why should a tech billionaire be held accountable for symbolism when he’s already too busy making electric cars, launching rockets, and alienating half the internet?

But let’s be real: symbols matter. The Bellamy salute was ditched for good reason. Imagine if Congress had said, “Eh, it’s fine, people will get over it.” Spoiler: they wouldn’t have. Musk’s wave, intentional or not, becomes a cultural grenade when paired with his history of wading gleefully into far-right rhetoric. It’s the sort of ambiguity that gives extremist groups just enough wiggle room to claim it as their own while Musk maintains plausible deniability. Genius, if you think about it.

Farrell’s Mussolini Love Letter: Context Meets Blindfold

Now, let’s address the elephant in the room—Farrell’s Mussolini book. The man described Il Duce as belonging in the “pantheon of great men” and suggested that fascism was “not so bad after all.” Bold take, Farrell. Given this glowing endorsement of a dictator, it’s hardly shocking that Farrell would be willing to downplay Musk’s little arm flourish. After all, what’s a casual nod to authoritarianism between historians?

Farrell insists Musk’s gesture is harmless. That’s a bit like calling Chernobyl a minor hiccup in urban planning. Intent doesn’t matter when the consequences are real, and the consequences here are a tech mogul sending signals—intentional or not—that the far-right can latch onto with glee.

Musk: Shaping the Cultural Battlefield

Musk isn’t just a guy with a lot of money and questionable taste in public stunts. He’s a cultural juggernaut whose every tweet, meme, and awkward gesture sends ripples across the digital landscape. Farrell would have us believe this is all meaningless, but ignoring the weight of Musk’s influence is like pretending the Titanic was just a boat with an iceberg allergy.

X, Musk’s dystopian vision for social media, is a masterclass in turning ambiguity into power. Civil rights groups see a potential fascist dog whistle; Musk’s fans see a misunderstood genius. Farrell? He sees a Star Wars salute. Context is for suckers, apparently.

Counterarguments: “But It’s Just a Wave!”

Let’s play devil’s advocate for a moment. Perhaps Musk really was attempting a Star Wars high-five, as Farrell suggests. If that’s the case, we can only assume he learned PR at the Darth Vader School of Charm. Ambiguity in gestures, especially politically charged ones, isn’t a bug—it’s a feature. Musk’s history makes it hard to believe he’s simply bumbling through these controversies. At best, he’s recklessly ignorant. At worst, he’s intentionally provocative. Either way, it’s a problem.

Conclusion: Farrell’s Missed Opportunity

Farrell’s analysis is a masterclass in missing the point. Yes, the gesture’s historical origins are interesting, but they’re not the story here. The real issue is how Musk’s actions, both past and present, shape public discourse. By focusing narrowly on technicalities, Farrell gives Musk a pass he doesn’t deserve, brushing aside the broader implications of his influence.

In a world where symbolism can incite violence or inspire movements, public figures have a responsibility to tread carefully. Musk, with his massive platform and controversial history, has repeatedly failed to do so. And Farrell, rather than holding him accountable, seems content to play historian while Rome burns (or salutes).

So, Farrell, here’s a suggestion: next time you’re tempted to wax poetic about arm angles, take a step back and consider the bigger picture. Because while you’re busy debating salutes, the rest of us are left grappling with the consequences of Musk’s actions. And trust us, they’re not nearly as academic as you seem to think.

Subscribe Now: Your Laughs, Our Fuel

Hey, you’re here, so clearly you enjoy sharp wit, hard facts, and holding nonsense accountable. Why not take it to the next level?

Subscribing helps us stay independent, roast-worthy, and relentless in calling out absurdity—whether it’s a billionaire’s baffling hand waves or government mishaps dressed as "solutions." Plus, your support amplifies these truths, making it harder for the powers that be to hide behind PR fluff.

Hit subscribe. It’s cheaper than therapy, funnier than doomscrolling, and your way of sticking it to nonsense—one laugh at a time. Click now. It really helps.