News Group Newspapers: The Empire of Sleaze Finally Meets Accountability
Undisputed Champion Of Crossing Moral, Legal, And Human Decency Boundaries In Pursuit Of Sensational Headlines.
It’s not every day that the world’s most notorious media empire is dragged through the mud it so gleefully wallowed in, but News Group Newspapers (NGN) has somehow outdone itself. For years, NGN—a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch’s vast kingdom of unethical journalism—was the undisputed champion of crossing moral, legal, and human decency boundaries in pursuit of sensational headlines. Thanks to Prince Harry’s relentless legal battle, the festering wound that is NGN has been ripped wide open for all to see. And what lies beneath? Decades of phone hacking, private surveillance, and more lies than a politician’s Twitter feed.
This week, the Duke of Sussex achieved what many thought impossible: NGN has been forced to apologise and pay substantial damages, reportedly exceeding £10 million. Yes, the Murdoch-run tabloid machine finally admitted what everyone already knew—they’re guilty of crimes so egregious they make reality TV producers look like moral philosophers. But let’s be clear: this "apology" is about as heartfelt as a spam email from a Nigerian prince.
NGN’s Decades of Depravity
Let’s rewind. NGN’s misdeeds aren’t just a one-off; they’re a business model. This is the company that hacked voicemails like it was a weekend hobby, spied on celebrities, royals, and regular folks alike, and then lied through their teeth about it for over a decade. To say NGN’s actions were unethical is like saying the Titanic hit a small ice cube.
Their victims? A veritable who’s who of public life, including Princess Diana, whose treatment by the press was so appalling it contributed to her tragic death. Prince Harry was subjected to a lifetime of similar harassment, his private life splashed across front pages thanks to NGN’s army of private investigators and phone hackers. Relationships were sabotaged, friendships destroyed, and trust in the press eroded—all for a few extra quid in ad revenue.
Even as the evidence of their crimes piled higher than their scandalous headlines, NGN remained defiant. For years, they denied wrongdoing, insisting that The Sun—their flagship tabloid—had no involvement in phone hacking. But thanks to Prince Harry’s dogged determination, we now know that was a lie. Not just any lie, but a carefully orchestrated cover-up designed to protect their profits while throwing News of the World—another Murdoch tabloid—under the bus.
A Timeline of Injustice
Prince Harry’s legal battle against NGN began in 2019, but the rot goes back much further:
2005: The Sun’s then-royal correspondent, Duncan Larcombe, received illegally obtained phone records of Harry’s then-girlfriend, Chelsy Davy. These were sourced from a South African private investigator. NGN’s response? Deafening silence.
2011: The phone-hacking scandal exploded, leading to the closure of News of the World. While NGN insisted The Sun was innocent, new evidence showed the rot was systemic across Murdoch’s empire.
2023: Prince Harry revealed the existence of a “secret agreement” between the royal family and NGN, allegedly preventing him from pursuing legal action sooner. NGN, true to form, denied everything while scrambling to suppress evidence.
2025: Just as the trial was set to begin, NGN folded, issuing an apology so verbose it almost masked the fact that it was utterly hollow.
The Hollow Apology
In their official statement, NGN issued a “full and unequivocal apology” to Prince Harry for the phone hacking, surveillance, and privacy violations committed by The Sun and News of the World. They even extended their regret to Princess Diana, acknowledging the role their intrusive reporting played in her life. But let’s not pretend this was a moment of moral reckoning. NGN’s apology is less about remorse and more about damage control, an effort to save face after years of denials that were, frankly, insulting to anyone with a functioning brain.
And then there’s the money. £10 million might seem like a lot—until you remember this is Rupert Murdoch’s empire. For them, it’s a rounding error. This is a company that has already shelled out over a billion pounds in legal costs and settlements related to hacking scandals. At this point, paying damages is practically a line item in their annual budget.
Murdoch: The Man Behind the Curtain
Speaking of Rupert Murdoch, let’s not let the man at the helm escape scrutiny. The billionaire media mogul has spent decades cultivating a culture of sleaze and sensationalism in his tabloids, all while keeping his hands suspiciously clean. The court may have ruled that his direct involvement in phone hacking couldn’t be tested at trial, but let’s not kid ourselves. Murdoch’s empire doesn’t operate without his implicit blessing.
This is a man who has built his career on exploiting tragedy, fabricating scandals, and turning the misery of others into profit. If NGN is a cesspool, then Murdoch is the master plumber, ensuring the filth flows freely.
Prince Harry: A Victory for Justice
Amidst the wreckage of NGN’s credibility stands Prince Harry, a man who refused to be silenced. For years, he has been painted as a petulant royal by the very tabloids that have tormented him since childhood. But his victory in this case is proof that he was right all along. This wasn’t just about personal vindication—it was about exposing a toxic media culture that has thrived on deceit and destruction.
Harry’s revelations in court were damning. He detailed how the tabloids had destroyed every relationship he had ever been in, how they turned his life into a spectacle, and how even his own family blocked his attempts to hold NGN accountable. Yet, despite the personal toll, he persisted. His decision to donate part of his settlement to charities advocating for privacy rights and media reform underscores his commitment to making sure no one else has to endure what he did.
The Fallout
So, what now for NGN? Will this settlement lead to real change, or is it just another PR exercise in damage control? If history is any guide, don’t hold your breath. Tabloid culture is like a cockroach—resilient, disgusting, and impossible to kill. NGN might be licking its wounds now, but the odds of them suddenly discovering journalistic ethics are about as likely as Murdoch winning a Nobel Peace Prize.
But this case has sent a clear message: the days of unchecked media power are over. Harry’s victory has set a precedent, one that could embolden other victims of tabloid intrusion to come forward. It’s a step toward accountability in an industry that desperately needs it.
A Legacy of Shame
In the end, NGN’s legacy will be one of lies, exploitation, and arrogance. They’ve spent decades tearing people down, only to be brought low by one man’s courage and determination. As for Rupert Murdoch, he may still be a billionaire, but no amount of money can buy back the shred of credibility NGN once pretended to have.
So, here’s to accountability, however fleeting it might be. And to NGN: may your next apology come with a side of actual remorse—not that we’re holding our breath.
If you've enjoyed this takedown of the media empire you love to hate, why not stick around for more? Subscribe today for your regular dose of scathing satire, biting commentary, and absolutely zero patience for hypocrisy.
Join us, won’t you? It’s free, it’s sharp, and it’s the antidote to bland, watered-down journalism. Because the truth deserves better than a tabloid headline.
Click subscribe now—you know you want to.
Don’t forget the shameful way,through the s*n, they led the country to believe Liverpool fans were to blame for the Hillsborough tragedy. Utter snakes the lot of them.
Ah, The Sun and its infamous dive into the pool of bad taste journalism. Let's revisit its Hillsborough coverage, shall we? On April 19, 1989, the paper emblazoned "The Truth" across its front page—a title so laughably ironic it should come with a rim-shot sound effect.
Among its "revelations"? That Liverpool fans pick-pocketed the dead, urinated on police, and attacked officers performing CPR. Astonishing claims that were not just false but seemed like the fever dream of someone trying to win a "Worst Take of the Year" competition. Even Orwell would have paused and gone, "This is a bit much, lads."
Naturally, the backlash was volcanic. Liverpudlians didn't just turn their backs on the paper—they built metaphorical bonfires of it and danced on the ashes. Despite half-baked apologies over the years, including one from Kelvin MacKenzie, the editor who signed off on this tabloid travesty, Liverpool collectively responded with, "Thanks, but no thanks," and continued their decades-long boycott.
The real "truth"? Hillsborough was a catastrophic failure of crowd management by South Yorkshire Police, as thoroughly laid bare in reports like the Hillsborough Independent Panel's findings in 2012 and the 2016 inquests. But why let facts ruin a headline when you can fan flames with baseless accusations, right? The Sun might have tried to spin its errors as "unintentional," but even a primary school student knows that copying the wrong answer is still a fail.
To this day, for Liverpool fans and many others, The Sun remains about as welcome as a rainstorm at Glastonbury. So, kudos to YOU Alan for reminding us all that sometimes, the only thing worse than no news is The Sun!